Seymour Hersh Laughs off New York Times Article on Nord Stream Culprits
The Pulitzer Prize winning journalist reported that the Biden administration was behind the bombing
NOTE TO READERS: Consider subscribing to The Trends Journal weekly magazine for trend forecasts and news analysis you won’t find anywhere else and support independent journalism. TrendsJournal.com.
Seymour Hersh, the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who wrote the expose on the Nord Stream pipelines sabotage last month, brushed off today’s report in The New York Times that blamed the attack on a “pro-Ukrainian group.”
Hersh’s original story went into detail on how the U.S. and Norway allegdly carried out the elaborate bombing. His theory is that President Joe Biden was concerned Germany would turn back to Russia for its natural gas if there was a cold winter and restart the pipeline. The White House called Hersh’s story completely false.
The Times’s report cited unnamed U.S. officials who said they reviewed new intelligence about the pro-Ukraine group with no known ties to the Ukrainian government. Ukraine also denied any role in the attack.
The paper said: The review of newly collected intelligence suggests they were opponents of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, but does not specify the members of the group, or who directed or paid for the operation.
Hersh seemed unimpressed with the report and laughed when reached by The Trends Journal. He joked, “I always thought either Somalia or Nepal were behind it.”
The Times’s decision to even cover the attack is a change in the U.S. media.
FAIR, the media watchdog group, ran an extensive article last week that looked into Hersh’s report and the response from top news outlets in the U.S.
The watchdog group noted that there was “not a word broadcast by the major US broadcast networks—NBC, ABC, CBS—or the publicly funded broadcasters PBS and NPR. No news stories on the nation’s major cable outlets, CNN, MSNBC and Fox News.”
But despite the lack of coverage in the U.S., Russia used Hersh’s story to demand a UN investigation and to threaten open-water chaos.
Vassily Nebenzia, Russia’s ambassador to the UN, told the Security Council that if the perpetrators are not found and brought to justice, it could become open season on undersea infrastructure for military strikes.
Germany’s ARD broadcaster and Zeit newspaper also released a report that said German authorities identified the yacht used in the sabotage, but noted that the lack of evidence could be a false flag, Al Jazeera reported.
TRENDPOST: Last Friday, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz flew to Washington for what amounted to a secret one-hour summit with President Joe Biden.
No staff attended the two-man meeting and to illustrate journalistic malpractice, none of the Presstitutes asked the German leader his thoughts about Seymour Hersh’s report that the United States blew up the Nord Stream pipelines.
The theory is that the Biden administration was worried Germany could turn back to Russia because of the cheap gas, and so the U.S. destroying the pipelines would prevent such a scenario.
And what was the real purpose of this secret meeting? No one was told. Was it to ramp up World War III?
In fairness, the US government is a “pro-Ukrainian group.”
Pushing Mr. Overton's window far into the realm of ridiculous.. How can ths be accidental. This apppears to be setting the stage for a paradigm-shift. How limited will the hang-out be?
How far will the rage be carried against the vaccine-genocide-war-criminals?
Don't get caught up in it. It's a powerful control-narrative. It will be used to keep wealth and power in the same hands as always, as some form of "global-financial-reset" takes place.