Nuclear 'Armageddon' is Biggest Risk Since Cuban Missile Crisis: Biden
Nuclear 'Armageddon' is Biggest Risk Since Cuban Missile Crisis: Biden
The Trends Journal has said we will go from the COVID War, to Ukraine War, to World War.
Note to readers: Please consider subscribing to The Trends Journal weekly magazine and get full access to our brand new website TrendsJournal.com. As always, thank you for reading. - Edmund DeMarche, executive editor.
President Joe Biden was at a Democratic fundraiser in New York on Thursday evening when he told a crowd that the U.S. is closer to facing nuclear Armageddon than any time since the Cold War with Russia in 1962.
“I don’t think there’s any such thing as the ability to easily (use) a tactical nuclear weapon and not end up with Armageddon,” Biden said, according to a pool reporter. He had been introduced by James Murdoch, the son of Rupert. (Like George Carlin said, “It’s one big club and you ain’t in it.”)
“We are trying to figure out: What is Putin’s off ramp?” Biden said. He continued, “Where does he find a way out? Where does he find himself where he does not only lose face but significant power?”
Biden’s comments came shorty after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky made his own nuclear appeal. Zelensky called for the West to take “preventive action” to stop Moscow from using tactical nukes.
The Trends Journal has made it clear that we are completely opposed to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but the fact remains that Moscow has a far superior military to that of Kyiv, and with each day that passes, the a major escalation can happen.
Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council and the former Russian president, has been critical of NATO’s nearly unlimited support for Ukraine’s war effort. He said it is inevitable that the “military campaign” in Ukraine will move to another level if the support continues.
Also See:
Zelensky: Putin Should Think Twice About Using Nukes
Cancian: No Question U.S. is in a Proxy War With Russia
Elon Musk Makes the Mistake of Calling for Peace
He said the West is intent on weakening Russia by proxy and won’t be able to sit it out.
“Everything will catch fire around them as well,” Ukrayinska Pravda translated. “Their people will be devastated. Their earth will literally burn, and concrete will melt. We too will suffer a lot. It will be very bad for everyone. After all, it is said: "By these three plagues a third of mankind was killed, by the fire and smoke and sulphur coming out of their mouths" (Rev. 9:18).”
The National Security Council to back UNODOC in England as economy based on financial services hence corruption. Also play up presence of UNODOC office in Austria and cooperation with DEA and F.B.I Organized Crime Division plus C.I.D. to investigate possible stocks in injection companies owned by English Government or financial incentives in both U.S.A and global basis. Of course as you say difficult to get that pit coild put to U.N. Security Council to investigate anyway. Then is still up to citizens to build UNODOC capacity as official organizations indoctrinated. Unless can argue Biden Administration abd Pfizer types biological warfare.
I am also antiwar. But it puzzles me why so many, (who know that Russia has been provoked by the hegemon for 8 long years, with the people of the Donbass undergoing genocide, and with the UK/US' absolute refusal to allow Ukraine to negotiate with Russia), were still opposed to Putin's SMO. Other than doing nothing and losing Russia to the godless West forever, what other choices did he have?