The “Samson Option” the idea that Israel “can deter its enemies because of the threat that it would use alleged atomic weapons if it viewed itself as facing certain, imminent destruction"
If Israel has a secretly kept arsenal of (thermo)nuclear tipped missiles, when and where did they test them, on Mars? Or, are we to accept it as a fait accompli that Israel has nukes never before tested? And that they will use them indiscriminately against whichever nation in the Persian Gulf Region the paranoids in the Knesset believe is their natural enemy? If Israel uses nukes they will unleash Armageddon on themselves.
Occupying Palestine for the past 75 years hasn't been easy for Israeli Zionists. Eisenhower stuck his boot up Israel's ass in 1957 when Israel joined the British and French attempt to seize control of the Suez canal. Ike sent US troops instead. British PM Anthony Eden tried to phone Ike to request US oil and a nuclear umbrella should the Soviets intervene on behalf of Egypt. Eisenhower refused to take Eden's phone call. Then there was the 67 war that saw US intervention not on the side of Israel but on the side of peace. Again and again Israel leaned on the US for its unqualified support behind Israeli provocations against Palestinians, to no avail, AIPAC or no AIPAC. That is, until now. And why is that, one might ask? There lies within the US/UK Anglosphere powerful financial interests that are panicked over what is occuring in the global south and the BRICS. Faced with an ongoing shift of financial and economic power, they have watched as the center of gravity in the world has shifted from the TransAtlantic to the TransPacific region led particularly by China and Russia. It is the reason NATO expanded eastward gobbling up 16 former nations of the Soviet Comecon, encircling Russia without so much as providing Russia security guarantees that Ukraine would not enter NATO. So now there are two hot wars fought by combatants from two non-NATO countries, against opponents of Anglo-American financial Hegemon. The danger of it going out of control in either conflict lies with the decisions made in the US not by Israel or Ukraine. The shrill screams that N. Korea is fighting alongside Russian troops is coming from this warparty faction in the City of London and Wall Street. The US does not want to be viewed by the international community as the aggressor in either war. It plays the role of defender of Israel and Ukraine's democracy while it facilitates weapons of war to both. The Anglosphere wants the BRICS out of Southwest Asia and Russia defeated. They want to
redraw the map in both regions of the world. Israel and Ukraine were chosen for this purpose. They are being played like expendable pawns on a chessboard in a Great Game. Ukraine has already been destroyed. Israel risks the same fate if it chooses to stay on the same path.
If Israel has a secretly kept arsenal of (thermo)nuclear tipped missiles, when and where did they test them, on Mars? Or, are we to accept it as a fait accompli that Israel has nukes never before tested? And that they will use them indiscriminately against whichever nation in the Persian Gulf Region the paranoids in the Knesset believe is their natural enemy? If Israel uses nukes they will unleash Armageddon on themselves.
If Iran nukes Israel, the Palestinian scums also die in the fallout . . . peace at last . . .
Occupying Palestine for the past 75 years hasn't been easy for Israeli Zionists. Eisenhower stuck his boot up Israel's ass in 1957 when Israel joined the British and French attempt to seize control of the Suez canal. Ike sent US troops instead. British PM Anthony Eden tried to phone Ike to request US oil and a nuclear umbrella should the Soviets intervene on behalf of Egypt. Eisenhower refused to take Eden's phone call. Then there was the 67 war that saw US intervention not on the side of Israel but on the side of peace. Again and again Israel leaned on the US for its unqualified support behind Israeli provocations against Palestinians, to no avail, AIPAC or no AIPAC. That is, until now. And why is that, one might ask? There lies within the US/UK Anglosphere powerful financial interests that are panicked over what is occuring in the global south and the BRICS. Faced with an ongoing shift of financial and economic power, they have watched as the center of gravity in the world has shifted from the TransAtlantic to the TransPacific region led particularly by China and Russia. It is the reason NATO expanded eastward gobbling up 16 former nations of the Soviet Comecon, encircling Russia without so much as providing Russia security guarantees that Ukraine would not enter NATO. So now there are two hot wars fought by combatants from two non-NATO countries, against opponents of Anglo-American financial Hegemon. The danger of it going out of control in either conflict lies with the decisions made in the US not by Israel or Ukraine. The shrill screams that N. Korea is fighting alongside Russian troops is coming from this warparty faction in the City of London and Wall Street. The US does not want to be viewed by the international community as the aggressor in either war. It plays the role of defender of Israel and Ukraine's democracy while it facilitates weapons of war to both. The Anglosphere wants the BRICS out of Southwest Asia and Russia defeated. They want to
redraw the map in both regions of the world. Israel and Ukraine were chosen for this purpose. They are being played like expendable pawns on a chessboard in a Great Game. Ukraine has already been destroyed. Israel risks the same fate if it chooses to stay on the same path.